HP EliteBook 2170p Ultraportable Review: Business Class, But Business Savvy?
by Dustin Sklavos on November 30, 2012 12:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Systems
- HP
- EliteBook
- Ivy Bridge
- Laptops
Introducing the HP EliteBook 2170p
We recently reviewed Acer's Aspire V5-171, a notebook that proves that there's a life (and a market) after netbooks but before ultrabooks. The essential gap that's materialized has been between the fast decaying netbook market (its death spurred on by Intel's Atom coupled with the high price of Brazos), and the expensive ultrabook market. More than that, though the 11.6" form factor is basically as small as a notebook can get while still featuring a full-sized keyboard, it's a gap that's essentially been going underserved for roughly a year now.
Acer wasn't the only one to spy this gap and try to fill it. ASUS has a notebook in stores right now that sports either an Ivy Bridge i3 or a Sandy Bridge i3 and touchscreen for Windows 8, and HP has an offering in their enterprise line that we have on hand for review today: the EliteBook 2170p. These notebooks have all been released with very little fanfare, and that's a shame, because there's definitely a niche for them. But while the Acer offering turned out to be a remarkably good deal for cost-conscious consumers, did HP misstep with their unusually pricey EliteBook 2170p?
It's tough to really get out of the gate without mentioning what HP is charging for the EliteBook 2170p. Enterprise-class notebooks almost always have a premium attached to them (though HP serves budget businesses with ProBooks and Dell with Vostros), the cheapest the 2170p goes for is $999, and that's for an Ivy Bridge i3. This is business class, but the price tag is still squarely in ultrabook territory. It's entirely possible for HP to make up the gap with a top shelf design, so let's see what we have to work with.
HP EliteBook 2170p Notebook | |
Processor |
Intel Core i7-3667U (2x2GHz + HTT, 3.2GHz Turbo, 22nm, 4MB L3, 17W) |
Chipset | Intel QM77 |
Memory | 1x4GB Elpida DDR3-1600 (expandable to 2x8GB) |
Graphics |
Intel HD 4000 Graphics (350-1150MHz, 16 EUs) |
Display |
11.6" LED Matte 16:9 1366x768 SEC3953 |
Hard Drive(s) | Toshiba MK-5061GSYN 500GB 7200-RPM SATA 3Gbps HDD |
Optical Drive | - |
Networking |
Intel 82579LM Gigabit Ethernet Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 802.11a/b/g/n 2x2 |
Audio |
Realtek ALC269 HD Audio Stereo speakers Combo mic/headphone jack |
Battery | 4-Cell, 30Wh |
Front Side |
Speakers Indicator lights |
Right Side |
SD/MMC reader Power switch USB 3.0 Ethernet VGA |
Left Side |
Kensington lock AC adapter USB 3.0 Exhaust vent SmartCard DisplayPort Combo headphone/mic jack |
Back Side | Battery |
Operating System | Windows 7 Professional SP1 64-bit |
Dimensions |
11.5" x 7.56" x 1.04" 292mm x 192mm x 26.5mm |
Weight | 2.89 lbs (1.31 kg) |
Extras |
720p HD webcam Flash reader (SD/Mini SD, MS/Duo/Pro/Pro Duo) USB 3.0 SmartCard Optional WWAN Fingerprint reader Backlit keyboard |
Warranty | 3-year parts and labor |
Pricing |
Starts at $999 As configured: $2,101 |
The price tag for our review unit is brutal, but if you're willing to drop down to a Core i5-3317U (and there's very little reason not to), you can shave about a grand off. HP also at least presently is offering a coupon code that chops a respectable 25% off of the purchase price, and from there you can get the EliteBook 2170p in the neighborhood of $700-$800, which is much more reasonable for a business class machine. As with the Acer Aspire V5 I reviewed recently, the ULV Intel Core i7 simply isn't worth it (the dual-core i7s in general frankly haven't been in some time anyhow).
As seems to have become traditional with HP's business-focused notebooks, the 2170p includes only one DIMM, running 4GB in a single slot. Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge both have pretty stellar memory controllers in the first place, so the CPU halves of the chips are seldom starved by single-channel operation, but the HD 4000 IGP does get hit a bit harder (which you'll see later on.)
It's not unusual to see a mechanical hard disk standard in an enterprise-class notebook where known reliable technologies are more important, though the lack of any kind of SSD caching does hurt, and the chassis does have at least the real estate for an mSATA SSD (though no port to house it).
Finally, connectivity is pretty stellar, with even SmartCard port on hand for business users, but the battery is a major sore spot. HP offers only a 4-cell, 30Wh battery or 6-cell, 48Wh battery as options. The 4-cell sits flush with the body; unfortunately we didn't have a 6-cell on hand to test with.
46 Comments
View All Comments
jabber - Friday, November 30, 2012 - link
....lemon.cbrownx88 - Friday, November 30, 2012 - link
Agreed.secretmanofagent - Friday, November 30, 2012 - link
I agree, call it for what it is. It sucks on performance, efficiency, and a horrible horrible display (which HP usually screws up on). I'm stuck with a different horrible EliteBook for work, and I want to set the thing on fire half the time.fic2 - Friday, November 30, 2012 - link
I would never spend $1k on a laptop with a 1366x768 display.Mumrik - Saturday, December 1, 2012 - link
Seconded.I feel so out of contact with whatever market it is that doesn't care about resolution...
BellaLohan - Sunday, December 2, 2012 - link
what Karen implied I'm shocked that a mom able to make $8024 in four weeks on the network. (Click on menu Home more information)http://goo.gl/EeD3j
retrospooty - Monday, December 3, 2012 - link
"I would never spend $1k on a laptop with a 1366x768 display."I wouldnt spend $100 with a display of that res. Seriously HP 1366x768 must die!
ArteTetra - Tuesday, December 4, 2012 - link
A resolution of 1366x768 is fine on a 11.6 inch display.A resolution of 1366x768 is fine on a 11.6 inch display.
A resolution of 1366x768 is fine on a 11.6 inch display.
Midwayman - Tuesday, December 4, 2012 - link
Nope. 768px tall makes it like view webpages through a tank-slit.. 16:9 is a terrible aspect ratio made worse by low resolution. The 900px tall 16:9 screens are about the lowest that are really useful.Besides you can get a tablet with 1080p or better for $400 these days. 1366x768 is inexcusable on a machine that cost that much anymore.
jabber - Wednesday, December 5, 2012 - link
Yeah 1440x900 should be the barest minimum on any laptop under 15" today.