Performance Metrics - II

In this section, we mainly look at benchmark modes in programs used on a day-to-day basis, i.e, application performance and not synthetic workloads.

x264 Benchmark

First off, we have some video encoding benchmarks courtesy of x264 HD Benchmark v5.0. This is simply a test of CPU performance. As expected, the higher-clocked / higher-TDP Core i7-4770R-based systems perform better than the Core i7-4712MQ in the VisionX 471D. However, the significant upgrade over the Core i5-4200M in the VisionX 420D must be noted.

Video Encoding - x264 5.0 - Pass 1

Video Encoding - x264 5.0 - Pass 2

7-Zip

7-Zip is a very effective and efficient compression program, often beating out OpenCL accelerated commercial programs in benchmarks even while using just the CPU power. 7-Zip has a benchmarking program that provides tons of details regarding the underlying CPU's efficiency. In this subsection, we are interested in the compression and decompression MIPS ratings when utilizing all the available threads.

7-Zip LZMA Compression Benchmark

7-Zip LZMA Decompression Benchmark

TrueCrypt

As businesses (and even home consumers) become more security conscious, the importance of encryption can't be overstated. CPUs supporting the AES-NI instruction for accelerating the encryption and decryption processes have, till now, been the higher end SKUs. However, with Bay Trail, even the lowly Atom series has gained support for AES-NI. The Core i7-4712MQ in the VisionX 471D does have AES-NI support. TrueCrypt, a popular open-source disk encryption program can take advantage of the AES-NI capabilities. The TrueCrypt internal benchmark provides some interesting cryptography-related numbers to ponder. In the graph below, we can get an idea of how fast a TrueCrypt volume would behave in the ASRock VisionX 471D and how it would compare with other select PCs. This is a purely CPU feature / clock speed based test.

TrueCrypt Benchmark

Agisoft Photoscan

Agisoft PhotoScan is a commercial program that converts 2D images into 3D point maps, meshes and textures. The program designers sent us a command line version in order to evaluate the efficiency of various systems that go under our review scanner. The command line version has two benchmark modes, one using the CPU and the other using both the CPU and GPU (via OpenCL). The benchmark takes around 50 photographs and does four stages of computation:

  • Stage 1: Align Photographs
  • Stage 2: Build Point Cloud (capable of OpenCL acceleration)
  • Stage 3: Build Mesh
  • Stage 4: Build Textures

We record the time taken for each stage. Since various elements of the software are single threaded, others multithreaded, and some use GPUs, it is interesting to record the effects of CPU generations, speeds, number of cores, DRAM parameters and the GPU using this software. One can reap significant benefits from the AMD R9 270MX in the OpenCL-accelerated second stage, as shown in the graphs below.

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 1

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 2

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 3

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 4

Dolphin Emulator

Wrapping up our application benchmark numbers is the Dolphin Emulator benchmark mode results. This is again a test of the CPU capabilities. Larger the number of available threads, the better is the performance. Within that set, systems based on CPUs with faster clocks / higher TDP compared to the Core i7-4712MQ perform better.

Dolphin Emulator Benchmark

Performance Metrics - I Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • Zizy - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    I don't see the point of this. Not good enough for fhd gaming, too expensive and power hungry for a HTPC.
    As for HTPC duties, what about testing 4K@60 and FHD@60 (both with H.265)? Not really needed now, but I would rather get something future proof, especially for this kind of money.
  • Daniel Egger - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    I totally agree. My (Desktop-grade) Haswell Core i5 with 750 Ti OC uses less in Idle and only slightly more under FurMark load yet is a completely different beast allowing for Full HD gaming despite running very quietly and staying cool.
  • heffeque - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    If you want hardware h.265 4K60p, you'll have to wait until Carrizo comes around.
  • MLSCrow - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    I honestly believe that Carrizo, is going to be the greatest HTPC/MiniGamingPC APU when it comes out and probably the first AMD processor that is worth purchasing since the Phenom II. Granted, they aren't going to release a Desktop version strait away if ever, and instead are releasing a Kaveri update, which is, meh, imo, but whatever...I'm just waiting for Zen to shock the world with it's Intel dominating performance, until Intel copies it, puts more money into it, and produces a better performing product, as they always have.
  • baii9 - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    I believe Intel had the lead on hardware 4k decode for a while, so stick with igpu? :)
  • kmmatney - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    yes - this is pretty neat, but you can get a laptop with better specs at this price, and inlcudes a screen and it portable. This system doesn't really need such a high end processor.
  • britjh22 - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - link

    I'm guessing this would actually be decent at FHD gaming, just not at the presets/detail settings that are used for AT's testing. I would really like to see a second detail setting for FHD be tested, as just because it fails at ultra settings doesn't mean it would at high/medium.
  • boe - Tuesday, February 3, 2015 - link

    I definitely want lot's of 4K goodness! I don't care if it makes it bigger use heat radiators and lose the fan. Offer a black model to match my other HT equipment as well. Offer a model without a disc player as I'm only using this to stream from a server.
  • Rafterman - Saturday, February 21, 2015 - link

    H.265 not really needed now, I would dissagree. AFAICS H.265(HEVC) is fast replacing AVC.
  • ToTTenTranz - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    The GPU's PCB seems to be risen above the motherboard's level.
    Is the M270X a MXM module? Can it be changed?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now