Life with the Lenovo Yoga 2 Pro
by Brett Howse on July 30, 2014 2:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Notebooks
- Lenovo
- Windows 8.1
- Yoga
Final Words
The Yoga 2 Pro is a good Ultrabook that has a few flaws that keep it from being great. First is the battery life. In a light workload, almost seven hours of battery life would have been spectacular not that long ago, but with the Haswell U series parts, it’s definitely on the low side of what is expected from the current series of Ultrabooks. For my personal situation, 6 2/3 hours is plenty, as the device is mostly used around the house or on a short trip. If the user needs a full day of work out of the laptop, there are better choices out there.
Another major complaint is the Wi-Fi card used. It is far too slow for a device in this price range, and can make the laptop difficult to work with. File copies over the network are slower than they need to be, and for only a small amount more on the bill of materials, Lenovo could have stepped up to a better solution. It is doubly important due to the lack of an Ethernet port on the device, meaning that a user could be hindered by the network performance depending on the work load. Hopefully the reports of a faster Intel Wireless AC 7260 card shipping in the latest iteration of the Yoga 2 Pro are correct, as that will certainly help with this point.
For the display, RGBW PenTile is a solution to a problem, but it’s not the best solution. However it does allow Lenovo to shoehorn a 3200x1800 resolution screen into this 13.3” chassis. As we have discussed, high DPI screens can have their issues in Windows, but overall the display is one of the standout features of this laptop. We have seen the rise of high DPI displays in tablets and smartphones for a reason, and it is great to see it in a laptop like this as well. The modern side of Windows 8.1 has no issues at all with this resolution, and is fantastic to use in this form factor. There are still some desktop programs that have issues with high DPI displays, and if you do need to use one of those you can always set the resolution to 1600x900. The only real compromise with this display is the RGBW matrix and the low contrast ratios and high black levels it produces. It may not be the best solution to a dense display, but for the price range it is understandable.
Other than those three things, there is a lot done well on the Yoga 2 Pro. The build quality is excellent, and the choice of soft touch plastic is comfortable to use and carry around. The keyboard is good, and the clickpad is nice and smooth. At 3 lbs, it is a very portable laptop. Perhaps one could nitpick that the laptop only has two USB ports, but two ports combined with the inclusion of an SD Card reader has not been a problem for me.
And then we come to the part of the laptop that gives it the name Yoga – the 360° hinge. Something that retrospectively comes across as so basic transforms this otherwise normal Ultrabook into a great device for touch input. For a lot of my use cases, I actually prefer the Yoga 2 in Stand Mode over a standard tablet. It is better for a lot of the web content I access because I do not have to hold the device up, and the performance of a Core i5 is better than any ARM based tablet out there. It is heavier than an ARM based tablet, but the benefit of Stand Mode removes the need to hold up the device. For watching videos, it is likewise great to prop the device open and enjoy a larger display than most tablets have.
The other modes are less useful though, at least in my experience. I have used the tent mode from time to time with the device on a table or counter, but not as often as in laptop or stand mode. With the display folded all the way around, it comes across as a poor tablet due to the weight, and the keyboard feels odd tucked underneath.
As a laptop, it is great, and as a tablet, it can also be great, but it is certainly more laptop than tablet. If the user can live with the battery life and poor W-Fi, the Yoga 2 Pro is a versatile two-in-one machine, with a crisp high resolution display.
103 Comments
View All Comments
bullzz - Wednesday, July 30, 2014 - link
"advertised clock speed of 1.6 GHz with all four cores at 100% usage"isnt this a dual core CPU
JarredWalton - Wednesday, July 30, 2014 - link
There are two virtual cores as well, so this was tested with a 4-threaded load.mapesdhs - Wednesday, July 30, 2014 - link
Even so, it's not correct to refer to four cores, that could easily confuse people.Personally I don't know how Intel gets away with using the i7 label for these
CPUs when they're all just dual core.
Ian.
TiGr1982 - Wednesday, July 30, 2014 - link
1. Then one should refer to four threads (as Intel names it itself officially).2. Well.. AFAIU, "i7" is just a brand, meaning "the top notch among its device class", happens to have HT, and in general has nothing to do with the particular number of physical cores:
1) i7 has 2 cores in ULV class
BUT
2) i7 has 4 cores in medium/big laptop class
3) i7 has 4 cores in mainstream desktop class
BUT
4) i7 has 6 (soon to be 8) cores in extreme desktop class
So "i7" is just a brand, supposed to make the customer think "Wow, this thing is gonna be fast".
As Semiaccurate founder calls it "iSomethingmeaningless" from the point of purely tech specs per se.
Brett Howse - Wednesday, July 30, 2014 - link
Thanks for the comment you are of course correct, it's 2 physical cores and 4 threads. Looks like Jarred already edited that sorry for the confusion.Dug - Thursday, July 31, 2014 - link
Same with i5. My desktop i5 is quad core, but my laptop is dual core.TiGr1982 - Friday, August 1, 2014 - link
Indeed; only i3 is more or less consistent (2 cores, 4 threads, no Turbo).Besides, Pentium and Celeron (based on big cores) are also consistent (when one does take into account Atoms rebranded as Celeron and Pentium).
TiGr1982 - Friday, August 1, 2014 - link
I meant, "when one does NOT take into account Atoms rebranded as Celeron and Pentium".Alexey291 - Saturday, August 2, 2014 - link
Essentially Intel CPU branding is a sordid mess - after all is said and done :)wetwareinterface - Sunday, August 3, 2014 - link
actually the pentium branding is anything but consistent right now.there are pentium cpus out right now that are based on 3rd generation dual core i3's with half the cache
dual core low voltage i3 half cache and 1-200 Mhz lower clocks than u series i3
and dual core 4th generation cores with no quick sync and hd 4000
and quad core 4th gen with quick sync enabled and hd 4000