Ultrabook Head to Head: Acer Aspire S3 vs. ASUS UX31E
by Jarred Walton & Manveer Wasson on December 21, 2011 5:40 AM ESTUltrabook Wrap-Up
We’ve now looked at three 13.3” ultrabooks, plus the MacBook Air 11 and 13, and the ASUS UX21E. I’ve also had some hands on time at a local store with a Samsung Series 9, so that covers much of the ultrabook market right now. Unfortunately, I haven’t had a chance to see any of the Lenovo IdeaPad U300/U400 offerings or any other ultrabooks in person (yet), so I’ll have to leave them out of consideration.
Taken as a whole, the one thing these laptops are doing right is making really slim and amazing looking devices. For those in the generic Windows laptop world that don’t get to many coffee shops where the cool people hang out, the first encounter with an ultrabook is almost invariable one of amazement. “Wow! That’s an amazing looking laptop. Is it any good or does it just look cool?” I had several (non-techie) people come by while I worked on this review, and that was basically the reaction from every one of them. I agree on the first point: these ultrabooks really look sleek. The question of whether or not they’re good isn’t quite so clear.
Understand first and foremost that the target market for an ultrabook values aesthetics and portability over performance. There are dozens of laptops that cost less and offer more performance, but that’s not the point. The purpose of ultrabooks is to provide a fast, light business laptop that can last through most of a day’s workload and not weigh you down while you carry it around. If that’s what you’re after, the Acer S3, ASUS UX31E, and Toshiba Portege Z835—and very likely the Lenovo U300 and any other forthcoming ultrabooks—should keep you happy. Buy whichever one has the best price or most appealing look and you’re good to go. If you’re looking for other features, however, you’ll want to consider exactly what you get a bit more. Personally, I’d rather have a slightly bulkier laptop with a 1080p display, more connectivity options, and a discrete GPU for some moderate gaming—the Dell XPS 15z is still one of my favorites for walking the fine line between price, features, performance, and quality. But let’s assume you’ve decided you want an ultrabook; which one should you get?
For best build quality right now and aesthetic, out of the units I’ve seen I’d place the Apple MacBook Air and the ASUS Zenbooks at the top of the list. The aluminum unibody construction of the MBA makes for a very solid feeling laptop and the ASUS Zenbooks are right there with it. If you value screen quality over other elements, the MacBooks once again get a recommendation, but I also have to give props to the Samsung Series 9 13.3” model—it has a beautiful matte panel with a great contrast ratio, and colors look far better than on the ASUS, Acer, or Toshiba offerings. On the other hand, ASUS offers a very bright display and is the only 1600x900 resolution in a 13.3” ultrabook right now—at least a baby step over the status quo laptop LCDs.
Some people still value wired connectivity; for such users, Toshiba is the only ultrabook I’ve seen so far with an integrated Gigabit Ethernet port—and yes, I missed having GbE on both the Acer and ASUS; would it have killed them to at least include a 2x2:2 MIMO WiFi adapter? Acer lacks USB 3.0, so connectivity folks will likely want to go elsewhere. If you’re after a good keyboard, my initial experience is that all of the ultrabooks (including the MacBook Air) don’t have a lot of key travel, which may or may not bother you. Subjectively, however, I think the Samsung Series 9 was the most comfortable keyboard for me to type on, followed by the MacBook Air, with the others all rating as slightly behind those two; also worth noting is the MBA and Series 9 both have backlit keyboards. Finally, for best battery life, so far ASUS comes out quite a bit ahead of the others, thanks to a larger 48Wh battery and good power optimizations.
That covers most recommendations, but there’s still one more point to consider: cost. While the Acer S3 doesn’t place first in most areas, it’s still an ultra thin laptop that looks decent, and the 256GB C400 SSD is better than most of the other SSD options. ASUS got the 128GB SF-2200 SSD right in the UX21E, but the 256GB SanDisk U100 doesn’t look like it can even keep up with the second tier SSDs; considering the cost, I’d avoid ASUS’ 256GB models. Apple meanwhile charges the most by a fairly sizeable margin—shocking, I know—but if you look at the previous paragraph you’ll find that they warrant consideration on most categories.
The most reasonable conclusion is that you have to choose what’s most important, as you simply can’t get it all. You can get an $1100 ASUS UX31E that has similar or slightly better performance compared to the base model $1300 MacBook Air 13, you get a higher resolution and brighter LCD panel, and you get USB 3.0 support along with Windows 7. For $200 more, you get a higher contrast LCD with a 16:10 aspect ratio, Thunderbolt, a backlit keyboard, and OS X. If you already prefer OS X, the choice is very simple, but some Windows users might actually be willing to spend the additional money for an MBA13 ($300 extra when you factor in the Windows license). If I were to recommend just one ultrabook right now, the $1100 ASUS UX31E-DH52 gets my vote, but if you want more performance without breaking the bank, the Acer S3-951-6432 has everything you need except for a good LCD and USB 3.0 priced at $1230. If you want the MacBook equivalent of the Acer, you’ll have to pony up $1700 to get the same CPU and a 256GB SSD, though I’d say the LCD and improved build quality are worth at least $200.
The ultrabook market is still relatively new, and there are additional models coming out from other companies. As SSD prices drop, we’re likely to see better prices as well, and really we’d like to stick closer to $1000 for a 128GB SSD and a Core i5 CPU. We’d also like to see more attention to detail, particularly on the LCDs. For a 13.3” laptop, 1440x900 or 1600x900 is my preferred resolution, but along with that I’d like something that can handle the full sRGB color space and offer close to a 1000:1 contrast ratio—and an anti-glare surface would be icing on the cake. We’ll see if any of the upcoming ultrabooks can surpass the current offerings, which unfortunately end up looking very much like a revised take on attractive but expensive ultraportables. They're not bad, but they're also not the type of product we can universally recommend without pointing out some of the potential drawbacks.
81 Comments
View All Comments
AssBall - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link
You know what would be cool? A 17" ultrabook. You could get a nice big screen and a keyboard that is not all clusterjammed in there. I hate tiny laptop keyboards.Nice review Jarred. I don't think I will be picking up one of these ultra's anytime soon. Looking forward to the Samsung review though.
Malih - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link
yes, I've been wondering why most thin laptops are limited to 13.3", would the extra space not be useful, or is it the limitation set by Intel, or is it because Apple don't make 15" MBA or is a 15" aluminum case cost too much to produce?17" might not be for everyone, but 14" or 15" are preferable for the masses, and with 15" you don't have to compete directly with Apple.
AssBall - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link
Maybe it is too expensive... I don't know. Plus the battery would be larger I suppose. It starts to get heavy and is no longer "ultra".I'd be very interested in a Llano based 17" Ultrabook with say a 128GB SSD, a more spread out keyboard, and a matte screen. Make the touch pad not suck too, please.
Thanks Santa.
cobalt42 - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link
Agree with both. If they used the extra keyboard space to make a nice cursor key cluster (arrow keys as well as home/end/pgup/pgdown and ins/del), they'd get my money. The others at that size either put a numeric keypad, or worse, nothing and just waste the extra space.AssBall - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link
Arrow keys and the home section, sometimes I wish they would toss it out because all of that stuff is on the number pad anyway. At least it is with my 12 year old WYSE keyboard. And then they could keep some space away from the standard qwerty section. I'd like that style of board. I don't much care for small function keys all crowded down either.Guspaz - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link
Strength becomes a bigger issue. If you keep the thickness the same, but increase the size to 17", the laptop would be enormously more delicate. More stress would be placed on it, if only because of the whole law-of-the-lever type thing. They'd have to make the 17" ultrabooks correspondingly thicker and more durable, and that would negate at least some of the advantage.A 15" ultrabook could be a lot more interesting, especially if they take advantage of a thinner bezel to fit the larger screen into a chassis that was only slightly larger than existing 13.3" ultrabooks.
Iketh - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link
nah I don't think durability would be hard to figure out, tho achieving that durability would likely increase the cost a good bitwadcock2 - Saturday, April 7, 2012 - link
ultrabook is define by Intel as a subnotebook with smaller size and weight. They are usually less than 6.5 lbs. They often have 7 -10 battery life (yea!). and are thin (< .7") to compete with Mac AirPro. There was one web page were the notebook had to fit into an 8.5"x11 interoffice mailing envelope. That also would require a smaller screen.I find that the 1366x768 pixel screens are too small to hole a whole video, photo or chart of today's web pages.
Yes, I'd like a light weight 17" laptop with long battery life and high screen resolution. The nearly 10 lbs plus another 2-4 for the power adapter makes it heavy to carry around and heavy on my lap.
bji - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link
Apple is supposed to be coming out with a 15 inch macbook air late Q1 next year. I am waiting for this and it will buy one; it will replace my 7 year old Panasonic Toughbook Y2 that thus far has not had a competitor for light weight, screen size, and build quality in the 14 inch+ size range.niva - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link
Right on, 17" frame will probably allow them to squeeze in a decent GPU in there too, something better than the integrated intel HD chip. Possibly even room for a hard drive to add more storage overall.The big thing I'm taking away from this review is the terrible screens. I'm surprised that they are that bad compared to the Apple screens. As much as many of us hate Apple and bash on them in the comments they've always been good about their displays.
Dell and Samsung are the companies who can buck this trend with terrible displays in these devices, lets hope it happens soon.