| Feature |
Canon EOS 20D |
Canon EOS 10D |
| Release Date |
August 2004 |
March 2003 |
| Price |
~$1500 (body only) |
~$1150 (body only) |
| Pixel Count |
8.2 Million |
6.3 Million |
| Camera Type |
SLR |
SLR |
| Highest Resolution |
3504 x 2336 |
3072x2048 |
| Lower Resolutions |
2544 x 1696, 1728 x 1152 |
2048x1360, 1536x1024 |
| Sensor Type |
CMOS |
CMOS |
| Sensor Size |
22.5 x 15.0 mm |
22.7 mm x 15.1 mm |
| LCD Screen Size |
1.8" |
1.8" |
| Lens Thread |
EF, EF-S |
EF |
| Auto Focus |
Yes |
Yes |
| Auto Focus Type |
TTL, 9 focus points |
TTL, 7 Point Focus |
| Manual Focus |
Yes |
Yes |
| Aperture Range |
N/A |
N/A |
| Shutter Speeds |
Bulb, 30 - 1/8000th sec. |
Bulb, 30 - 1/4000th sec. |
| ISO |
100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200 |
100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200 |
| Flash |
Built-in, pop-up |
Built-in, pop-up |
| External Flash |
Yes, hot-shoe, sync |
Yes, hot-shoe, sync |
| Flash Range |
Guide no: 43 ft (ISO 100) |
Guide no: 43 ft (ISO 100) |
| Flash Compensation |
+/- 2 stops in 0.3 or 0.5 increments |
+/- 2 stops in 0.3 or 0.5 increments |
| Exposure Compensation |
+/- 2 stops in 1/3 increments |
+/- 2 stops in 1/3 increments |
| White Balance |
Auto, daylight, shade, cloudy, tungsten, fluorescent, flash, manual, Kelvin (color temperature) |
Auto, daylight, shade, cloudy, tungsten, fluorescent, flash, manual, Kelvin (color temperature) |
| Bracketing |
Yes, +/- 2 EV in 0.3, 0.5, or 1.0 EV increments |
Yes, +/- 2 EV in 0.3, 0.5, or 1.0 EV increments |
| Metering |
Evaluative (35-zone), Partial, Center-weighted |
Evaluative (35-zone), Partial, Center-weighted |
| Color Space |
sRGB, Adobe RGB |
sRGB, Adobe RGB |
| Aperture Priority |
Yes |
Yes |
| Shutter Priority |
Yes |
Yes |
| Manual Exposure |
Yes |
Yes |
| Continuous Drive |
Yes, 5 fps for approx. 20 frames (Large/Fine), 6 frames RAW |
Yes, 3 fps for 9 frames (Large/Fine), 9 frames RAW |
| Self Timer |
Yes, 10 sec. |
Yes, 10 sec. |
| Storage Method |
CompactFlash Type I and II, Microdrive |
CompactFlash Type I and II, Microdrive |
| Storage Included |
None |
None |
| Compressed Format |
JPG |
JPG |
| Uncompressed Format |
CR2 (Raw file + separate JPEG) |
CRW (Raw file with embedded JPEG) |
| Quality Settings |
Fine, Normal (JPEG) |
Fine, Normal (JPEG) |
| Video clips |
None |
None |
| Battery Type |
BP-511A Lithium-Ion Rechargeable |
BP-511 Lithium-Ion Rechargeable |
| Charger Included |
Yes, 90 minutes |
Yes, 90 minutes |
| PC Interface |
USB 2.0 Hi-Speed |
USB 1.1 |
| TV-out |
Yes |
Yes |
| Tripod Mount |
Yes, metal |
Yes, metal |
| Weight (w/out battery or card) |
1.5 lb |
1.7 lb |
| Dimensions |
144 x 106 x 72 mm |
150 x 107 x 75 mm |
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
14 Comments
View All Comments
shuttleboi - Monday, November 15, 2004 - link
What exactly is the point of these camera reviews? As I wrote several months ago, Anandtech is a gadget/hardware site, not a photography site. If you want to reach the photography community (like the rich folk who hang around DPReview.com, spending $1000 a month on lenses, and are ready to click on lots of advertisers' banners), you should do something novel. I suggested reviewing portable photo storage devices (e.g. the Epson P-2000, Archos AV-480, and Nikon ), but nobody listened to me. Suit yourself. As soon as you review any of these gadgets, you will find yourself on DPReview.com, gizmodo.com, and other popular sites. But don't listen to me, I'm just a yuppie male, age 28-40, making a good salary; it's not like your advertisers care about my demographic or anything.Joony - Friday, November 12, 2004 - link
I love my 20D, check out my photogallery,http://www.pbase.com/joony
Gatak - Thursday, November 11, 2004 - link
You may also want to look at the DCRAW - Digital Camera RAW. It is a open source program for reading RAW files from most camera RAW files.DCRAW vs. Canon D60: http://www.aim-dtp.net/aim/digicam/dcraw/
DCRAW vs. Canon 10D: http://www.insflug.org/raw/analysis/dcrawvsfvu/
DCRAW source: http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/
Windows binary: http://home.arcor.de/benjamin_lebsanft/
stephencaston - Thursday, November 11, 2004 - link
Woodaddy, thanks for your comments. A Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro lens was used for all the tests except on page 11 (where each picture lists the lens used beneath the thumbnail). I've also amended the other image quality pages to indicate the use of the 50mm. Sorry for this oversight.WooDaddy - Thursday, November 11, 2004 - link
I missed something critical here. Let me know if it was posted. What lens are you using? Since DSLRs have interchangable lenses, the image quality is directly related to the lens used. If not listed, you really want to say that for reference in you image quality tests.#8, #3 I've picked on Stephen when he first got started on his reviews. He's getting better and IMO he's doing a great job. Now mind you, dpreview is for photogs/techies with an emphasis on photogs. AT is the converse; techies/photogs. I would consider ease of use and image quality and control to be a focus in a review at dpreview. Technical features would be the focus at AT....
Personally, I'm a photog more so than a techie camera guy. I'm doing quite well with my Nikon FE2 manual camera (with Acer 2740s film scanner) and Minolta G400 backup.
AtaStrumf - Thursday, November 11, 2004 - link
Wau, this thing makes some great pics! Way too expensive though.Gatak - Thursday, November 11, 2004 - link
#3 Yes dpreview has many good articles. But I think this is a good start anyway. Dpreview is very technical and doesn't really provide much explanation of technical stuff. This is something I think Anandtech could advance in =) It is possible to have technical depth and yet have good, easy to understand explanations.ProviaFan - Thursday, November 11, 2004 - link
#4 - that's why we have the term "prosumer". It's (the 20D) better than consumer, which would be the digital rebel, but it's not in the league of 1D Mark II (even though it has the same resolution, the speed and build quality don't compare) or 1Ds - which are professional.stephencaston - Thursday, November 11, 2004 - link
#4, The 20D is often referred to as a Prosumer camera. Among the reasons are price, 1.6x cropping factor, sealing, built-in flash, and _optional_ battery grip.The 20D is aimed at amateur photographers looking to replace/supplement their existing film SLR or for those looking to upgrade from a non-SLR camera. I've also heard of pros buying 10D and 20D bodies as backup cameras. I don't think it would be fair to the 1D line to call the 20D a professional camera. It is very nice, but not quite pro ;-)
sjprg - Thursday, November 11, 2004 - link
Nice article, I use both a 10D and a 20D and would like to see some ACR tests added to the CPU processing tests besides the emphasis on games to assist us in selecting the best hardware for processing digital images. One of the test that could be used is the Tom Fors ACR calibrator beta 3.http://fors.net/scripts/ACR-Calibrator/