The Design: Olympus C-50 Zoom



99 x 58.5 x 41.5 mm



The front of the camera has a sliding door that acts as the main power switch for the camera as well as a shield to protect the lens. When you slide the door to the side, the lens extends automatically and the camera is ready to shoot. Conversely, sliding the door back towards the lens triggers the camera to power off, causing the lens to retract and the shutter to close. It is worth noting that, on occasion, we found that we moved the sliding door accidentally during shooting and caused the camera to power off. The lens has an aperture range of f2.8 - 8.0 in wide angle mode and f4.8 - 8.0 in telephoto mode. The camera is capable of shutter speeds from 1/1000th - 8 seconds. On the top left is the Self-timer/Remote control lamp. This light flashes to tell the user when the picture will be taken in remote control or self-timer mode. Just to the right of this lamp is the viewfinder window. In the right corner is the built-in flash. The flash range is 0.6 - 11.2 ft in wide angle and 1.0 - 6.6 ft in telephoto mode. Below the built-in flash is the receiver for the remote control. The C-50 Zoom has a 3x optical zoom that is equivalent to 38-114mm on a 35mm camera. There is also a 4x digital zoom.



The Olympus C-50 Zoom is much smaller than the Kodak DX4530 and has a magnesium alloy body. Given the layout of the controls on the back, there was very little room for a comfortable place to rest our thumb. We had to rest our thumb on the Mode dial. Luckily, however, the Mode dial is sturdy enough that it does not rotate when our thumb rubs against it. On the left side of the camera is the review monitor which is 1.5" with 134,000 pixels. Above the monitor are the viewfinder, orange and green indicator lamps, a flash/erase button, and a Macro/Spot/Protect button. Pressing the flash button cycles through the following 6 modes: Auto, Red-eye, Fill, Slow (to capture ambient light in addition to the flash), Slow w/Red-eye, and Off. Pressing the Macro/Spot button in shooting mode cycles through the following 4 options: Spot metering mode, Macro mode, Macro with Spot metering mode, and Off. In playback mode, pressing the Macro/Spot/Protect button will mark an image as "protected" so that you cannot delete it by accident. While in macro mode, you can focus from 7.9 inches - 19.7 in wide angle and 11.8 - 19.7 inches in telephoto. We have some trouble understanding how Olympus considers this range a macro range.

In the middle of the camera, just to the right of the LCD monitor is the Monitor/Quick View button and a red lamp that blinks while a picture is being written to the camera or a flash card. The Quick View button serves to turn on/off the live LCD display while in record mode. A double-press of this button will switch the camera to review mode where you can look at previously stored pictures and video clips. On the right side are the Mode dial and an arrow pad. The arrow pad has a separate OK/Menu button in the middle. Rotating the mode dial selects one of the following options: Fully automatic, Portrait, Landscape and Portrait, Landscape and Scene, Night Scene, Sports, Self-portrait, Movie, My (custom settings), and P/A/S/M (Program, Aperture priority, Shutter priority, and Manual) mode. If P/A/S/M mode is chosen, a series of menus must be used to select which sub-mode you want.



Olympus kept the top of the camera pretty clear with just the shutter button and a zoom control. The zoom control on this camera is much more sensitive than the Kodak DX4530. We were able to zoom optically at ~20 different levels with the C-50 Zoom. This gave the zoom a more fluid feeling than the DX4530.


On the bottom is the compartment for the LI-10B rechargeable lithium-ion battery pack (supplied with a charger in the box). The charge time for the battery back is about 2 hours. Behind the same hinged door is the slot for an xD-Picture Card (a 32MB card is supplied in the box). Also on the bottom of the camera is a plastic tripod mount. Something that we feel is worth mentioning is the 256MB flash card capacity limitation on the C-50 Zoom. Because of this limitation, we had to buy a 256MB card, as our 512MB version simply did not work in the camera. We found this limitation to be especially contradictive, since the camera has the option to record in the large file-sized TIFF mode and offers no way to upgrade past a 256MB card.

UPDATE: A firmware update is available that would allow 512MB xD cards to be used in the C-50 Zoom. To receive the update, you must send your camera to one of two Olympus service centers with the proof of purchase from your 512MB Olympus, SanDisk, or Lexar xD card. Without the proof of purchase, the upgrade is $39.95.


The right side of the camera has a tab that snaps in place to cover the USB port and the Video out jack. You can select NTSC or PAL output through the Setup menu. There is also a wrist strap post on this side.



The only thing on the left side is the port for the optional 4.8V AC adaptor.

The C-50 Zoom offers a wide range of image size settings: TIFF (uncompressed), SHQ, HQ, SQ1, and SQ2. Option SQ2 has 4 additional choices. The details of each of these settings are outlined in the table below.

Setting Compression Resolution (pixels)
TIFF Uncompressed 2560x1920
SHQ JPG 2560x1920
HQ JPG 2560x1920
SQ1 JPG 2048x1536
SQ2 JPG 1600x1200
JPG 1280x960
JPG 1024x768
JPG 640x480

All of the quality options have an aspect ratio of 4:3. In addition to the resolution settings, sharpness can be set to Hard, Normal, or Soft and contrast can be set to High, Normal, and Low. The C-50 Zoom supports xD-Picture Cards and comes with a 32MB starter card in the box. Since our tests with the SHQ setting averaged around 2MB per picture, you will most likely find yourself needing a higher-capacity card.

Auto focus on the C-50 Zoom is very straightforward. You simply point the two auto focus brackets over the subject that you are trying to capture and press the shutter down halfway. If the camera is able to lock focus, the green indicator lamp will light up on the back of the camera to the right of the viewfinder. If it is not able to lock focus, the green light will flash. Olympus did not include manual focus on this camera.

It is nice to see that Olympus included Program, Aperture priority, Shutter priority, and Manual exposure modes on this camera. This adds a great deal of flexibility in terms of creative control. Two other handy features that are available on this camera are exposure compensation and flash compensation. Both can be adjusted to +/- 2 stops in 1/3 stop increments. To adjust the exposure compensation, all you need to do is press the left arrow key to decrease and the right arrow key to increase exposure. To adjust the flash compensation, you can set up a shortcut in order to adjust the setting with the press of two buttons (otherwise, you must navigate through a few menu options). It should be noted that there is a mode called "My Mode" that allows you to customize default settings for essentially every option in the menu. This is very convenient for people who want to switch to their favorite settings quickly.

The C-50 Zoom gives you two options for metering: Digital ESP and spot. Digital ESP is the default metering mode and it measures both the light in the center and the rest of the frame separately. It's good to have the option to switch to spot metering mode if there is a strong light behind the subject. This would help ensure against underexposing the subject. It's disappointing to see that the C-50 Zoom does not have an option for manual white balance. Instead, you are given 5 options: Auto, Daylight, Overcast, Tungsten, and Fluorescent. The camera offers the following ISO settings: Auto, 80, 160, and 320.

This camera also offers a continuous drive option to record 1fps for 3 frames (continuous drive is not available in TIFF mode). You can select between continuous drive with or without auto-focusing before each picture. In addition, the camera has a bracketing feature with options +/-0.3, 0.7, and 1.0 for 3 or 5 frames (bracketing for 5 frames is only available in SQ2-1024x768 and 640x480 modes).



Like the Kodak DX4530, the C-50 Zoom has a Movie mode that records video clips at 15fps. There are two options (both are QuickTime): 320x240 (for up to 15 seconds) or 160x120 (for up to 70 seconds). We should point out, however, that this Olympus camera does not record sound with its video clips. The C-50 Zoom comes with a small remote control that offers zoom controls and a shutter button. To use the remote, you must turn on the Remote Control option in the menu. Pressing the shutter button on the remote will trigger the camera's self-timer/remote control lamp to start flashing. After about 3 seconds, a picture will be taken. The remote can also be used in video mode to start and stop recording. Another useful function of the remote control is its ability to cycle through pictures while outputting to a TV screen. You can also use the "-" and "+" keys on the remote to zoom in during playback.

A couple of extra functions on the C-50 Zoom include Panorama and 2-in-1 mode. In Panorama mode, the camera locks the exposure, focus, and white balance settings for the first frame taken and allows up to 10 frames to be recorded. Software included in the box helps to stitch these frames together to create the final panorama. The 2-in-1 mode is a way to take 2 separate pictures and have them saved as one file. You are prompted to take the first vertical half of the picture and then the second. The two pictures are joined and saved automatically. TIFF is not available as a quality setting for the 2-in-1 mode.

To get to playback mode while the lens is extended, you can press the Quick View button twice. During playback, you are given six levels of magnification from 1.5x-4x to zoom in on a particular part of a photo. In addition, there are a few options for image manipulation in-camera. While in playback mode, you can rotate an image, convert it to Sepia or B&W, or resize it to either 640x480 or 320x240. If any of these options are selected, the camera saves a separate file with the changes and leaves the original file intact.

There were a couple things that we found frustrating about the C-50 Zoom. First, the camera does not offer the option to delete a picture immediately after it is taken during auto-review. It would have been easy to implement this option as Kodak did on their DX4530. Instead, you must hit the Quick View button twice to switch to playback mode and delete it from there. Secondly, navigating the menu system is not immediately intuitive because the button for "OK" and the menu are the same. This dual-function button takes some getting used to during menu navigation. For example, while navigating through the menus, you must press the right arrow key to confirm a highlighted menu option instead of the OK/Menu button. However, if you are actually selecting a specific setting, then you must use the OK/Menu button to confirm your choice. The menu would be much easier to use if there were dedicated OK and Menu buttons. Although it takes some time to get the feel of the menu operation, it is easy enough to navigate.

It's a shame that they didn't include manual focus and white balance modes on this camera, given that it has a Manual exposure mode. We tend to think that advanced settings such as Manual, Aperture priority, and Shutter speed priority go right along with the ability to perform manual white balance.

Olympus C-50 Zoom Specifications Casio QV-R51 Specifications
Comments Locked

9 Comments

View All Comments

  • LX - Friday, July 16, 2004 - link

    A review of digicams on AnandTech is like a review of CPUs on dpreview or a review of motherboards on imaging-resource.

    Choosing digicams for comparison based on their pixel count is like comparing CPUs based on their MHz.

    Please stick to your field of competence!
  • Mermaidman - Friday, July 16, 2004 - link

    What next? A review of the new and improved ROOMBA robot vacuum? :p
  • reljam - Friday, July 16, 2004 - link

    This review was really below the 'Anandtech standard'. The comments posted above are all valid, but you completely forgot to do indoor tests.

    Cameras (especially small ones) suffer from not being able to produce a sharp image in low light conditions. Taking three shots outdoors, even on a cloudy day is going to give you decent results 90% of the time. If you want to see noise, try taking indoor shots with the flash on. In indoor shots flash range becomes very important (portrait-only flash is unacceptable), and the amount of noise in the background is something that's a very real problem.

    Your testing methodology is roughly like taking a Celeron, a P IV and and AMD64 and running IE page rendering tests - yes, there may be differences, but that's not the distinguishing feature.
  • nigham - Friday, July 16, 2004 - link

    I think the review was done fairly well - though I am disappointed to say that at the end of it, I'm certainly not going to buy any of these things. All of them sure seem to have a few problems.

    physologically speaking, the best feeling i get after an anandtech article is when i really feel - hey i should actually go ahead and buy this thing... zilch of that here.

    so what you probably need is to review all of these along with some really good cameras (and i'm sure they're out there - having used a DSC-P93 i can say that the picture quality is definitely better than the pics i've seen in this review).

    if price range is your method of choosing "similar" cameras, i'd agree with SKiller and say go ahead and include 3/4 mp cameras if they've got much better quality, alongside the 5 mp ones, and let us make the choice of what we want to pay for. personally i can't for the life of me think what i'd ever do with a 2500x2000 pixel image.

    i think for a first effort in the humanly-priced cameras, this was OK and i'm sure you guys will only keep getting better.
  • EddNog - Friday, July 16, 2004 - link

    I say screw it and just buy a Canon. ;-P
  • ianmills - Thursday, July 15, 2004 - link

    ahahaha
    :)
  • WooDaddy - Thursday, July 15, 2004 - link

    This is a TOTAL waste of time. Let me count the ways:

    1) All of the pages were direct testing method rips from dpreview.

    2) THE CAMERAS ALL CAME FROM DIFFERENT YEARS (development cycles)!!! 2002, 2003, 2004?!? COME ON!! If you are going to have a comparision, compare cameras built within the same time frame! Do you think Anand, Wesley or Kris would attempt to do an apples to apples direct comparo on CPUs that were three years apart!?! NO!

    3) WTF is with this conclusion!? THERE IS NO ADDED VALUE TO ALL THAT TESTING YOU DID! If you realized that those cameras weren't similar enough, the review should've stopped. The only difference you could find was price!? All Anandtech readers should feel insulted by that.

    4) What was the basis for choosing these cameras?When CPU or Mobo comparision are done, they are done with products that are marketed to be similar. I didn't see the logic in choosing these three.. as a matter of fact, no reasoning was given at all.


    Lastly, Anand, Kris, or whoever senior editors.. I am disappointed in YOU more so than anyone else. Don't you review the articles posted? Virtually every single article that you've posted in the years have had relevance, structure, in-depth conclusion, value-added information to bring upon very educated purchasing decisions. Two hiccups back to back like this is horrible. You've done research, so research what makes a good digital camera review... NO! Consider your purpose first. Anandtech is not a digital camera review site. That is such a large genre and almost completely separate from IT-based products. It's like going to McDonalds and not only asking and getting a filet mignon, but then expecting it to be as good ...

    To slightly calm down, I don't believe that Anandtech is the appropiate forum for articles like this. I also didn't think the review represented the quality and in-depth nature of the majority of the reviews here. I believe the attempt add digital cameras to the review list is showing that the genre of the website is starting to lose its direction. Anandtech is a IT and consumer level PC product review site, not a general blog, review everything website. Digital cameras have links to this world but are not a subset.
  • WooDaddy - Thursday, July 15, 2004 - link

    Look...

    ....

    I'm really pissed about this. Let me calm down and post later...
  • SKiller - Thursday, July 15, 2004 - link

    5mp cameras at this price range are still not a very good option IMHO. They tend to sacrifice quality and features for the added resolution. I think that 3-4mp cameras at this price can give much better results unless you absolutely have to have 5mp.

    I'd consider Canon PowerShot A75, A80, Fujifilm FinePix F601Z, Kodak DX6340, and Samsung Digimax V4 from the "more advanced features" category.

    Good review though.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now