Notebooks at Netbook Prices: How Low Can We Go?
by Jarred Walton on July 28, 2009 12:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Laptops
Enter the $300 Laptop
It used to be that getting any laptop for under $1000 was virtually impossible unless you were willing to buy used. Since 2000, we've seen a huge surge in laptop sales along with an accompanying drop in prices. We've had new laptops starting at under $600 since around 2005, but a quick look at the specs of the laptops in that old article will show you just how far we've come in four short years. For those that don't want to follow the above link, here's a quick recap.
Four years ago, $600 would buy you a single-core processor (Celeron M or Sempron) running at between 1.4GHz and 1.6GHz. Hard drives were usually of the 40GB 4200RPM or 5400RPM variety, paired with 24X CD-RW/4X DVD-ROM combo drives. And here's something that's amazing in today's market: many inexpensive notebooks failed to provide built-in WiFi support (though you could add it for a moderate $50 or so). The real kicker however is that all of those cheap laptops checked in with a paltry 256MB DDR-333 RAM. Ouch! Battery life ranged from just over two hours to around four hours, which is one area where things unfortunately haven't really improved much.
What can you get in an entry-level notebook (not netbook!) these days? Best Buy and Wal-Mart have had $300 laptops in the news lately, though it appears both are "limited quantities/availability". Rather than restrict ourselves to short-term sales, we wanted to look at the specs of a few sub-$500 notebooks you can currently buy. We'll start with Wal-Mart's $300 offering as the baseline - it went on sale this past Sunday Morning (July 26) and likely sold out shortly thereafter. However, it's an in-store-only offering, so unless you run by your local Wal-Mart(s) there's no way to know for sure if it's available or not.
The $300 Compaq Presario 15.6" CQ60-419WM
This is not a powerhouse laptop by any stretch of the imagination, but if you want something that can run circles around a netbook and prefer a larger keyboard and screen (and lower battery life and increased weight) then this Compaq Presario has a lot going for it. The Sempron SI-42 is a single-core 65nm processor with 512KB L2 running at 2.1GHz - it should be rather similar in performance to the old Athlon 64 3500+, which should be about twice the speed of the Intel Atom N280 give or take. [Ed: Note that the link compares a dual-core 1.60GHz Atom with a single-core Pentium 4 3.6GHz - and the P4 660 ends up being about 65% faster on average; twice as fast is a conservative estimate!] For web surfing, office work, email, and other basic school needs such a CPU is more than "fast enough". Graphics are provided by NVIDIA's GeForce 8200M, which should handle even HD video playback.
Perhaps one of the best aspects of this notebook is that it comes with 3GB of DDR2-800 memory. Compaq ships the unit with Windows Vista Home Basic, which is naturally a 32-bit version. There's not much sense in getting a 64-bit version of Home Basic (why get a stripped down, 64-bit OS?), and while we could grumble a bit about not getting 4GB RAM for a few dollars more, without a 64-bit OS it really doesn't matter. Also keep in mind that Windows Home Basic is not eligible for Windows 7 upgrades (this applies to all the laptops in this article shipping with Home Basic). Rounding out the package you get a 160GB hard drive, DVDRW, and 802.11G networking. Battery life with the 6-cell battery is "up to four hours", though we suspect three hours will be more likely under light usage. The LCD quality on virtually all sub-$500 laptops/notebooks is going to be questionable at best, but it's doubtful anyone in the market for such a computer will notice.
This is a great laptop for the price - as a point of reference, the Compaq 15.6" CQ60-410US is very similar in overall specs (slightly lower in some areas and higher in others) and retails for $448. Of course, it's not a limited availability laptop. Assuming you can find the CQ60-419WM in stock, the real question is whether you like the lightweight netbooks with improved battery life or you prefer a larger display, keyboard, and laptop with better performance. You get what you pay for, and in this case it's a very reasonable trade if you're not a demanding computer user.
We can say the same about many other laptops, so let's look at a few of the alternatives that are available online and in stores. We searched Best Buy, Wal-Mart, and a few other websites looking for laptops that sell for rock-bottom prices while still providing all of the necessary features. We tried to avoid any limited time offers, which means prices are going to be higher than $300, but you should be able to find similar laptops at a variety of retailers. Here's what we found.
40 Comments
View All Comments
snookie - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link
In what alternate universe does the el cheapo Ace "compete" with the MB Air? Not the same specs, not the same OS, nowhere near the same level of quality or support. Plenty of other laptops have 8 hr battery life so that isn't it.brybir - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link
It competes because it can functionally do most of the same things as an Air, and has one of its primary selling points, 8 hrs of use and a small/light form factor in a package that is 1/3 the price of the air. Worth at least a look to me.If you are not buying the Air for battery life and size/weight then why are you spending the extra money over a similarly configured macbook?
RadnorHarkonnen - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link
Must agree here, i wouldn't buy/recommend an Acer or brands related. emachines, packard bell and gateway are some of the few.I wouldn't buy HP also, but that has nothing to do with the product itself. They are ussually decent ones.
IlllI - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link
i would not recommend those either for people who want good customer servicebrybir - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link
I would want to look at actual failure rates and rate of return for individual brands before I gave advice to anyone.I wouldn't want to make the mistake of making recommendations based off of personal experience when that may not be indicative of actual rates of failure within each brand.
That said, my gateway notebook has been rock solid for three years and my gateway desktop has been more stable than my homebuilt PC. So if I were to go out and give advice I would recommend Gateway. But I don't because I have no idea whether I was just lucky with good Gateways or whether there are actual, material, difference within each brand that I can quantify so I am just not spouting unverifiable opinion.
KompuKare - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link
Well, I have to agree about the Acer since any I've seen were all rather flimsy.However, quality is seldom figured in on comparisons like this or the Lenovo would have been singled out for extra praise.
I confess that I have a Thinkpad T60 and compared to any laptop I've ever owned it just oozes durability and quality. Decent battery life too and I've only go the six-cell
JarredWalton - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link
I modified the text slightly, but that was Acer's professed goal: a PC alternative to the Air. As for 8 hour battery life, there really aren't that many Windows laptops that provide that sort of battery life in a 13.3" chassis, and certainly not with a moderate sized battery. I've seen 95Whr batteries in smaller laptops yield 8 hours, but that's as much like the Air as the Timeline.IlllI - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link
Can't wait for the timeline review. Theres also going to be an 11.6in version, which i would think would be closer to $300 markCalin - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link
Making a notebook (higher performance than the typical netbook) in a small enclosure brings with it a price premium, not the other way around. So, I think the 11.6in version would be more expensive than the 13.3 inch version, and possibly have lower battery life.IlllI - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link
i don't see why it should. if its basically the same as 13.3 version only with a smaller screen