Sony A200: Entry DSLR Roundup
by Wesley Fink on October 20, 2008 1:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Digital Camera
Sony A200 Competition
With the recent street price declines in the Canon XS, the $500 entry segment has grown by one. Three DSLR cameras in the market now sell for around $500 with a kit lens. How does the A200 compare to the Olympus E-420 and the Canon XS?
All three cameras are based on a 10MP sensor. The Olympus E420 is the smallest DSLR you can buy but it does not feature any kind of IS. The A200 features in-body stabilization that works with any lens to improve hand-held shooting 1-4 stops in low light. The Canon XS kit lens has Optical Stabilization, but you must buy additional IS lenses if you want that feature.
The Sony A200 has the widest ISO range of the group, as it is the only entry in its class that extends to ISO 3200. However, if Live View is important to you, you will not find it on the Sony A200 as you will need to step up to the $599 Sony A300 for Live View. The Canon XS and Olympus E420 both feature Live View, but it is the slow "grafted on" variety, where the Sony A300/A350 actually have a useful Live View with a tilt-screen and fast AF.
Camera Comparison - Sony A200 vs. Competition | |||
Sony A200 | Canon XS EOS 1000D |
Olympus E420 | |
LCD Screen | 2.7" Fixed | 2.5" Fixed | 2.7" Fixed |
Sensor | 10.2 MP CCD | 10.1 MP CMOS | 10.0 MP NMOS |
AF Points | 9 | 7 | 3 (11 in Live View) |
Sensor Size | 23.6x15.8mm | 22.2x14.8mm | 18.0x13.5mm |
Sensor Multiplier | 1.5x | 1.6x | 2X (Four-Thirds) |
Image Processor | BIONZ | DIGIC III | TRUEPIC III |
Image Stabilization | Body Integral (All lenses) |
IS Lens Only | None |
Auto Sensor Clean | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Live View | None | Contrast & Phase Detect | Contrast with Face Detection & Phase Detect |
Metering Modes | Multi-Segment, CWt, Spot | Evaluative, CWt, Partial | ESP Multi, CWt, Spot, Highlight Spot, Shadow Spot |
ISO Range | 100-3200 | 100-1600 | 100-1600 |
Auto ISO Adjust | Yes | Yes (Auto Fixed ISO 100-800) | Yes |
Continuous Speed | 3 fps | 3 fps | 3.5 fps |
Wireless Flash Control with Built-in Flash | Yes | No | Yes |
Remote Release | Wireless Remote, Cable | Cable | Wireless Remote, Cable |
Storage | CF | SD/SDHC | CF |
Viewfinder | .83x, 95% | .81x, 95% | .92x, 95% |
Battery | NP-FM500H (1600mAh) | LP-E5 (1080mAh) | BLS-1 (1150mAh) |
Battery Life (50% Flash) | 750 | 500 (190 Live View) | 500 (Less in Live View) |
Battery Grip | VG-B30AM, Optional | BG-E5, Optional | No |
Size | 131x98.5x71mm | 126x98x65mm | 130x91x53mm |
Weight (with Battery) | 1.39 lb. (626g) | 1.16 lb. (502g) | 15.5 ounces (440g) |
Kit Lens | 18-70mm f3.5-5.6 (27-105mm) |
18-55mm f3.5-5.6 IS (29-88mm) |
14-42mm f3.5-5.6 (28-84mm) |
Price with Kit Lens | $499 | $525 | $530 |
Camera Comparison - Sony A200 vs. Competition (Cont'd) | ||||
Olympus E520 | Nikon D60 | Sony A300 | Pentax K200D | |
LCD Screen | 2.7" Fixed | 2.5" Fixed | 2.7" Tilt | 2.7" Fixed |
Sensor | 10.1 MP Live MOS | 10.2 MP CCD | 10.2 MP CCD | 10.2 MP CCD |
AF Points | 3 (11 in Live View) | 3 | 9 | 11 |
Sensor Size | 17.3x13.0mm | 23.6x15.8mm | 23.6x15.8mm | 23.5x15.7mm |
Sensor Multiplier | 2X (Four-Thirds) | 1.5x | 1.5x | 1.5x |
Image Processor | TRUEPIC III | EXSPEED | BIONZ | PRIME |
Image Stabilization | Body Integral (All lenses) |
VR Lens Only | Body Integral (All lenses) |
Body Integral (All lenses) |
Auto Sensor Clean | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Live View | Contrast with Face Detection & Phase Detect | no | Full-Time by Mirror Selection | no |
Metering Modes | ESP Multi, CWt, Spot, Highlight Spot, Shadow Spot | 3D Matrix, CWt, Spot | Multi-Segment, CWt, Spot | Multi-Segment, CWt, Spot |
ISO Range | 100-1600 | 100-3200 | 100-3200 | 100-1600 |
Auto ISO Adjust | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Continuous Speed | 3.5 fps | 3 fps | 3 fps | 3 fps |
Wireless Flash Control with Built-in Flash | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Remote Release | Wireless Remote, Cable | Wireless Remote, Cable | Wireless Remote, Cable | Wireless Remote, Cable |
Storage | CF | SD/SDHC | CF | SD/SDHC |
Viewfinder | .92x, 95% | .80x, 95% | .74x, 95% | .85x, 96% |
Battery | BLM-1 (1500mAh) | EN-EL9 (1000mAh) | NP-FM500H (1600mAh) | Four AA Batteries |
Battery Life (50% Flash) | 650 | 730 | 730 | 500 |
Battery Grip | No | No | VG-B30AM, Optional | BG3, Optional |
Size | 136x91.5x68mm | 126x94x64mm | 131x99x75mm | 134x95x74mm |
Weight (with Battery and Card) | 1.05 lb. (476g) | 1.22 lb. (553g) | 1.49 lb. (676g) | 1.52 lb. (689g) |
Kit Lens | 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 (28-84mm) |
18-55mm f3.5-5.6 VR (27-83mm) |
18-70mm f3.5-5.6 (27-105mm) |
18-55mm f3.5-5.6 (27-83mm) |
Street Price with Kit Lens | $599 | $599 | $599 | $599 |
The balance of the entry class sells for a street price about 20% higher than the A200, and adds the Olympus E-520 (E420 with body IS), Nikon D60, Pentax K200D, and Sony's own A300. The Sony models, Canon XS, and Pentax all have more advanced AF modules, as the Nikon and Olympus models have just 3 AF points. The Nikon, like the Canon XS, ships with an Optical Stabilized kit lens featuring Nikon VR, but IS is only available if the lens features it. All the other competitors have body-integral IS that works with almost any lens you can mount.
The Nikon D60 and Pentax K200D, like the Sony A200, do not feature Live View. The Olympus E520 and Sony A300 do feature Live View, but the $599 Sony A300 features the most useful Live View we have used in a tilt 2.7" screen - none of the other competitors has a tilt screen. The A200 has a brighter, larger, and easier to use viewfinder than the A300 - so you get truly useful real-time Live View on the A300, but with compromised frame coverage and a tunnel-like viewfinder.
The Sony 18-70mm kit lens also covers a wider zoom range at a 27-105mm equivalent than any of its competitors, which generally feature an 18-55mm kit zoom. This will be important to some potential buyers. The Nikon D60, which also features a Sony CCD sensor similar to the A200/A300/A350, is the only model to offer ISO choices to 3200 like the Sony entry models.
A pop-up flash is something most buyers expect in an entry DSLR and take for granted. However, not all entry flash is equal as you will see in the comparison charts above. Nikon and Sony both support a very good wireless flash system that can normally be controlled by the pop-up flash. As you can see, Canon does not have such a wireless flash system. However, many potential buyers do not realize that Nikon does not support their Creative Lighting System with the pop-up flash on the D60. This makes the Sony A200 a better choice than Canon or Nikon if wireless flash is a feature that matters to you. Wireless flash is also supported, in slightly different capabilities, by the Pentax and Olympus entry models.
Sony and Olympus are the only ones to offer two models in this entry DSLR class. The only real difference in the Olympus E420 to the E520 is the addition of in-body IS and a larger hand grip to the E520. For the Sony A200 and A350 the differences are huge and reflect solutions aimed at very different market segments. While they are based on the same 10.2MP sensor, the A200 is an updated half-price A100. It is a very capable camera that will appeal to serious amateurs looking for as many shooting options as possible at the lowest cost.
The Sony A300 is the ultimate Live View camera that makes no apologies for compromising the viewfinder and LCD frame coverage to provide what is arguably the best and easiest to use Live View in the market. If you want an even higher-res sensor with tilt-screen Live View you can move up from the 10.2MP A300 to the 14.2MP A350 for $200 more, which is a street price of $799 with a kit lens. This, however, is 60% more than the Sony A200, which is a different price class that includes several other midrange models.
32 Comments
View All Comments
JarredWalton - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link
I think particularly in the entry level DSLR arena, using the included lenses for images is important. The pictures of even a moderate DSLR with kit lens should easily surpass what most P&S cameras can manage, which is one of the big attractions. As soon as you get into lenses, however, you open up a huge can of worms.As for the subject material... well, I'll leave it to the photography buffs to debate what should be used. I believe Wes is working on some photos showing what the A200 can do out of a static test environment, but in order to provide any semblance of apples-to-apples shooting comparisons I think you need to do something like the shots Wes uses. I know I for one wish the white balance on my XTi did better under Tungsten lighting.
nowayout99 - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link
"...it is easy to forget that many buyers are looking for the absolute best "bang-for-the-buck" in a camera."Really...? Therein lies a divide between AT and readers. Articles for high-end products really aren't appealing to that many people, yet that's almost all we've gotten for cameras.
Even this $500 cam is pretty high-end priced for the vast majority of people that just want something they can take around with them for fun. How about some comparisons of joe schmoe cameras?
strikeback03 - Tuesday, October 21, 2008 - link
On Sunday a friend and I went to a local state park to get some pictures of the leaves. He owns a Canon SD600, a relatively decent couple year old P&S. At one point he was asking me to get some close-ups of a rock face, so instead I tossed my Sigma 18-200 OS on my Rebel XT body (wasn't using either) and let him play with those. I think he is now in the market for an SLR, as some comparison shots he did with his SD600 just blew him away, and that was just in basic JPEG mode.GTVic - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link
This is what epinions and CNET is for. I don't think you will find too many serious reviewers who want to spend their time keeping updated on the sub $200 camera market. It is not interesting, there are too many cameras to keep track of and not many people do serious research on that level of purchase.adder - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link
well i hope u guys do some lens reviews,and for people who are going in for a entry level dslr may not know much about lenses other then the kits lenses.strikeback03 - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link
Is the grip the same as the A100? Between the length and positioning of the shutter release/dial, I found the A100 quite uncomfortable to use. For me either the shorter bodies like the Canon Rebels or the taller ones like Nikon D80/Canon 40D are far more comfortable.FATCamaro - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link
It is a great point and shoot camera. I use mine a LOT and couldn't be happier. I use it as a point and shoot except for ISO and flash control. The ISO control is incredible simple and useful. I would reccomend this to to anyone switching up to a DSLR from a shitty point and shoot.DanD85 - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link
It seems you forget the still available D40/D40x and I think they perfectly fit in the budget DSLRs you have here.Wesley Fink - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link
Ken Rockwell notwithstanding, the D40 is 6 megapixels and the D40x is the previous model to the D60. Both are capable entry DSLRs that have been updated in the D60, which we did test in our comparison.The D40/D40x are 3-point AF, have no sensor cleaning, and come with non-IS kit lenses. Their features have been upgraded on the D60, which is the entry model we tested.
xsilver - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link
also forgotten is the pentax line. The k200d doesnt have live view either but using old lenses on them is a joy.