Gateway E-155-C: A Lightweight Convertible
by Jarred Walton on July 4, 2007 12:05 AM EST- Posted in
- Laptops
Battery Life
In the past, our standard battery life test has been provided courtesy of MobileMark 2005. Since we're now moving towards testing with Windows Vista (which MobileMark 2005 doesn't support), we needed to come up with a new method to determine battery life. Generally speaking, we don't expect people to seriously tax their laptops when they are unplugged, so we tried to create benchmarks that will simulate normal use.
For the first battery test, we use Internet Explorer to simulate surfing the web. We have a script that starts Internet Explorer and loads our three homepages, all of which contain quite a few Flash-based advertisements. The script then sleeps for 60 seconds, simulating "reading" a web page(s), after which Internet Explorer is shut down and reloaded. Internet Explorer is set to delete all temp files on exit, in order to continue to generate hard drive activity. The other battery life test is simply DVD playback, and we use Star Wars Return of the Jedi as our test DVD. Basically, the Internet Explorer test corresponds to about the best case scenario you are likely to encounter, while the DVD test is a bit more taxing.
Gateway sent us both their 4-cell and 6-cell batteries for testing. The results are summarized in the following table, along with scores for the HP dv6500t.
The default 4-cell battery doesn't provide a lot of battery life unless you turn down the display brightness. Since we felt the display was already relatively dim, we certainly wouldn't want to use the laptop at reduced brightness settings. However, for the record we were able to improve battery life by 30 to 35% by running the display at minimum brightness. Moving to the 6-cell battery increases battery life by about 50%, as expected. In the near future, Gateway will also begin shipping 8-cell batteries - they are already selectable in the online configurator.
Another anomaly that cropped up concerns brightness, so we'll address that now. Windows Vista would periodically adjust the display brightness while we were using the system, for no apparent reason (though not during our battery benchmarks, thankfully - it appears to be related to input from the keyboard/mouse). Sometimes the LCD would get darker, and sometimes it would get lighter. The E-155-C has three keys that allow you to adjust the display brightness. Two of these are used to increase or decrease brightness, while the third appears to cycle between three settings (minimum, medium, and maximum). Unfortunately, for some reason Windows Vista disables the increase/decrease brightness keys. (We experienced the same problem with the HP dv6500t.) We would assume this is another driver issue, though whether it's the display drivers or something else we can't say.
Power Consumption
Related to the battery life discussions we've just finished, we have power results. For power testing, we remove the battery from the laptops and measure system power draw at the wall outlet using a Kill-A-Watt device. We test several different scenarios to try to isolate the power draw of the various components. First, we have the baseline measurement when the system is idle and sitting at the desktop. No applications are running for 10 minutes or more but the screensaver and hard drive sleep mode are disabled. As a CPU load test, we run the SMP version of Folding@Home at 100%. Finally, for maximum power load we leave Folding@Home running and start 3DMark05. In this way, we can see roughly how much power the GPU is using in 3D mode versus 2D mode.
The E-155-C doesn't consume a lot of power, and clearly a large portion of the power is going to the display. The difference between maximum and minimum brightness is about 5W, so maximum brightness increases idle power consumption by over 30%. The maximum power draw of the system when the CPU is under full load increases by 9W, so the display still increases total system power draw by 20% under load. Given the relatively small battery capacity, every additional watt of power draw can have a noticeable impact on battery life. We're looking forward to testing some laptops that use LED backlighting to reduce the LCD power requirements without compromising on brightness levels.
In the past, our standard battery life test has been provided courtesy of MobileMark 2005. Since we're now moving towards testing with Windows Vista (which MobileMark 2005 doesn't support), we needed to come up with a new method to determine battery life. Generally speaking, we don't expect people to seriously tax their laptops when they are unplugged, so we tried to create benchmarks that will simulate normal use.
For the first battery test, we use Internet Explorer to simulate surfing the web. We have a script that starts Internet Explorer and loads our three homepages, all of which contain quite a few Flash-based advertisements. The script then sleeps for 60 seconds, simulating "reading" a web page(s), after which Internet Explorer is shut down and reloaded. Internet Explorer is set to delete all temp files on exit, in order to continue to generate hard drive activity. The other battery life test is simply DVD playback, and we use Star Wars Return of the Jedi as our test DVD. Basically, the Internet Explorer test corresponds to about the best case scenario you are likely to encounter, while the DVD test is a bit more taxing.
Gateway sent us both their 4-cell and 6-cell batteries for testing. The results are summarized in the following table, along with scores for the HP dv6500t.
Battery Life (Minutes) | ||||
HP dv6500t 6-cell | HP dv6500t 12-cell | Gateway E-155-C 4-cell | Gateway E-155-C 6-cell | |
Internet Explorer (Max. brightness) | 133 | 246 | 111 | 168 |
DVD Playback (Max. brightness) | 105 | 205 | 98 | 146 |
The default 4-cell battery doesn't provide a lot of battery life unless you turn down the display brightness. Since we felt the display was already relatively dim, we certainly wouldn't want to use the laptop at reduced brightness settings. However, for the record we were able to improve battery life by 30 to 35% by running the display at minimum brightness. Moving to the 6-cell battery increases battery life by about 50%, as expected. In the near future, Gateway will also begin shipping 8-cell batteries - they are already selectable in the online configurator.
Another anomaly that cropped up concerns brightness, so we'll address that now. Windows Vista would periodically adjust the display brightness while we were using the system, for no apparent reason (though not during our battery benchmarks, thankfully - it appears to be related to input from the keyboard/mouse). Sometimes the LCD would get darker, and sometimes it would get lighter. The E-155-C has three keys that allow you to adjust the display brightness. Two of these are used to increase or decrease brightness, while the third appears to cycle between three settings (minimum, medium, and maximum). Unfortunately, for some reason Windows Vista disables the increase/decrease brightness keys. (We experienced the same problem with the HP dv6500t.) We would assume this is another driver issue, though whether it's the display drivers or something else we can't say.
Power Consumption
Related to the battery life discussions we've just finished, we have power results. For power testing, we remove the battery from the laptops and measure system power draw at the wall outlet using a Kill-A-Watt device. We test several different scenarios to try to isolate the power draw of the various components. First, we have the baseline measurement when the system is idle and sitting at the desktop. No applications are running for 10 minutes or more but the screensaver and hard drive sleep mode are disabled. As a CPU load test, we run the SMP version of Folding@Home at 100%. Finally, for maximum power load we leave Folding@Home running and start 3DMark05. In this way, we can see roughly how much power the GPU is using in 3D mode versus 2D mode.
System Power Draw (Watts) | |||||
ABS Mayhem Z5 | ASUS A8JS | ASUS G2P | Gateway E-155-C | HP dv6500t | |
Idle | 44-49 | 26-32 | 43-52 | 16-21 | 22 |
100% CPU | 67-71 | 47-52 | 71-81 | 25-30 | 57 |
Maximum | 100 | 71 | 97 | 34 | 67 |
The E-155-C doesn't consume a lot of power, and clearly a large portion of the power is going to the display. The difference between maximum and minimum brightness is about 5W, so maximum brightness increases idle power consumption by over 30%. The maximum power draw of the system when the CPU is under full load increases by 9W, so the display still increases total system power draw by 20% under load. Given the relatively small battery capacity, every additional watt of power draw can have a noticeable impact on battery life. We're looking forward to testing some laptops that use LED backlighting to reduce the LCD power requirements without compromising on brightness levels.
25 Comments
View All Comments
JarredWalton - Wednesday, July 4, 2007 - link
13-15" screens, discrete graphics, and faster CPUs all generate more heat, which requires better cooling, which makes them quite a bit heavier. And there's still plenty you can do with a laptop that you can't do with a PDA... even if you get a keyboard attachment (which pretty much makes your PDA heavier and less portable). As stated, this laptop certainly isn't for everyone, but it does serve a purpose. It was quite a bit easier to use on an airplane than even a slightly larger laptop, and forget about trying to use a 17" DTR if you're sitting in coach!gigahertz20 - Wednesday, July 4, 2007 - link
Sorry to have to ask this question here but I was wondering when the P35 roundup article will be released? Gary Key promised it would come at the end of June yet here it is July and nothing. Will this roundup be delayed until the end of summer or is it cancelled.Thanks for any response.
Gary Key - Wednesday, July 4, 2007 - link
Sorry about the delay, it will go up right after the m-ATX roundup (which is upside down after NV and AMD had a driver war for IGP solutions this month) that finally starts this week. I have been trying to keep people updated on changes to each board with the short articles. We just received P35 boards from abit, Foxconn,and Biostar that have made it through the first test passes. Please email me if you have any questions about the boards or need further information. I will be glad to provide opinions on the eight boards we have now and an educated guess on the three coming next week.
FireTech - Saturday, July 7, 2007 - link
Sorry Gary, but another update in the µATX review update thread you started would be much preferable to this particular comment hidden in a totally unrelated review.There are a bunch of guys waiting to hear from you about this and currently feel very let-down.
najames - Wednesday, July 4, 2007 - link
It will happen right after the mATX roundup.