High Speed DDR2: Buffalo and Crucial Deliver 1000+
by Wesley Fink on July 7, 2006 12:05 AM EST- Posted in
- Memory
DDR2 1067 (1:2) Performance
Performance does improve a bit with the added speed of DDR2-1067, but much of the speed increase is lost to the slower memory timings required at DDR2-1067. All three DDR2-1000 memories based on Micron chips reached this next performance level and beyond with ease.
It is worth carefully comparing the DDR2-1000 results provided in the charts for each memory with the DDR2-1067 results. Performance is generally better at DDR2-1000 with all 3 memories tested here. This is partly the result of the modest overclock to a clock setting of 300 and a FSB of 1200. However, required timings are also lower with memory at DDR2-1000 and that also contributes to improved performance. With the future Core 2 Duo test bed providing added multipliers, we should be able to more closely compare DDR2-1000 performance to other values without having to overclock the bus to reach this memory speed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93f44/93f44b9f769eee832b584d96012e47ad9f83dfb9" alt="DDR2-1067 (3.47 GHz) Calculation Performance"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22b1f/22b1f088c3c4c37f2d941e2c6668ac523c2ca915" alt="DDR2-1067 (3.47 GHz) Standard (Buffered) Memory Test"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53a67/53a67b5a065ba761d7ade273854b5cfdab953eac" alt="DDR2-1067 (3.47 GHz) Unbuffered Memory Test"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28c57/28c57426a070a5b625ed4e60f567f4814ca478d9" alt="DDR2-1067 (3.47 GHz) - Far Cry"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f634b/f634beea1c039b51340e1a56a77031d8f70c87f1" alt="DDR2-1067 (3.47 GHz) - Half-Life 2"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f124b/f124b7f71f873a59838d201d36c48988db30df7d" alt="DDR2-1067 (3.47 GHz) - Quake 4"
Performance does improve a bit with the added speed of DDR2-1067, but much of the speed increase is lost to the slower memory timings required at DDR2-1067. All three DDR2-1000 memories based on Micron chips reached this next performance level and beyond with ease.
It is worth carefully comparing the DDR2-1000 results provided in the charts for each memory with the DDR2-1067 results. Performance is generally better at DDR2-1000 with all 3 memories tested here. This is partly the result of the modest overclock to a clock setting of 300 and a FSB of 1200. However, required timings are also lower with memory at DDR2-1000 and that also contributes to improved performance. With the future Core 2 Duo test bed providing added multipliers, we should be able to more closely compare DDR2-1000 performance to other values without having to overclock the bus to reach this memory speed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93f44/93f44b9f769eee832b584d96012e47ad9f83dfb9" alt="DDR2-1067 (3.47 GHz) Calculation Performance"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22b1f/22b1f088c3c4c37f2d941e2c6668ac523c2ca915" alt="DDR2-1067 (3.47 GHz) Standard (Buffered) Memory Test"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53a67/53a67b5a065ba761d7ade273854b5cfdab953eac" alt="DDR2-1067 (3.47 GHz) Unbuffered Memory Test"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28c57/28c57426a070a5b625ed4e60f567f4814ca478d9" alt="DDR2-1067 (3.47 GHz) - Far Cry"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f634b/f634beea1c039b51340e1a56a77031d8f70c87f1" alt="DDR2-1067 (3.47 GHz) - Half-Life 2"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f124b/f124b7f71f873a59838d201d36c48988db30df7d" alt="DDR2-1067 (3.47 GHz) - Quake 4"
24 Comments
View All Comments
Wesley Fink - Saturday, July 8, 2006 - link
That is DDR2-533 is DDR2-533 on BOTH Intel and AMD.rallyhard - Friday, July 7, 2006 - link
Wow, that's some nice memory!Kinda makes me feel a little less rediculously proud of the Mushkin XP2 PC2-5300 2gb sticks that I'll possess tomorrow.
Oh well, at least I paid less than half the price of either of these!
And to the above poster: Get a life!
TheGlassman - Friday, July 7, 2006 - link
And since they were not tested on AM2, no point for me to consider any of them.ShoNuff - Friday, July 7, 2006 - link
First in!!! I've allways wanted to do that...reading now.