The Timing Tests

* NOTE: For all of our time tests, the cameras are reset to their factory default settings and set to record using the highest resolution and quality setting. They are set to record in Auto mode. We also disabled all sounds and "welcome" screens. We used a PNY 512 MB SD card, Fujifilm 512 MB xD card, and a SanDisk 512 MB Memory Stick Pro Duo.

Before reading our results, please refer to our Testing Procedures page.

Startup Time

The startup time is recorded from the moment that the power button is pushed to the moment that the shutter sounds. All cameras are set to record in Auto mode.

Startup time (seconds)
Sony DSC-T33 1.59
Canon SD400 1.90
Nikon S1 2.95
Olympus IR-300 4.08

With respect to startup time, the Sony DSC-T33 wins by a small amount over the Canon SD400. The Nikon S1 is still pretty fast at 2.95 seconds. The Olympus IR-300 takes a much longer time to start up compared to the other cameras at 4.08 sec. If you consider that the Canon SD400 is the only one in the bunch that extends its lens during startup, its performance here is even more remarkable.

Auto-Focus and Shutter Lag

To record shutter lag, we perform two tests with the lens at its widest angle setting. For the first test, we pre-focus the lens and measure the amount of time that it takes the camera to take a picture after the shutter button is pressed. The second test measures the time that it takes for the camera to take a picture after we press the shutter button without pre-focusing. Each test is performed 3 times and the results are averaged. For these tests, we enabled the auto area point selection function for each camera (if applicable). For more information regarding our testing procedures, please refer to our Testing Procedures page.

With Pre-focus (seconds) Without Pre-focus (seconds)
Sony DSC-T33 ‹0.01 0.38
Canon SD400 0.04 0.57
Nikon S1 0.03 0.64
Olympus IR-300 0.13 0.94

The Sony DSC-T33 is clearly the fastest camera here in terms of shutter and focus lag. In general, we have been impressed by the speed of all Sony cameras that we have tested. The Canon SD400 is the second fastest followed very closely by the Nikon S1. We weren't terribly impressed with the Olympus IR-300 in our lag tests. In fact, none of the Olympus digicams that we have ever tested have achieved a faster pre-focused shutter lag time faster than 0.13. When we included focusing in the lag time, the IR-300 took nearly a second to take a picture after pressing the shutter button. In addition, the Olympus IR-300 is the only camera out of the four that showed different lag times when we disabled the auto area AF function. We were a bit surprised to see that the IR-300 took longer (1.28 sec.) to focus and shoot when set to "Spot AF" as opposed to "Auto AF".

Write Times

We recorded 5 different write times using a PNY 512 MB SD card, Fujifilm 512 MB xD card, and a SanDisk 512 MB Memory Stick Pro Duo.

Single Shot - The time that it takes for a single picture to be written completely to the flash card (the time that the "activity light" is on).
Shot To Shot (STS) - The time until the second shot can be taken after the first (shutter to shutter).
Shot To Shot w/Flash - The time that it takes the camera to take two pictures with the flash (from flash to flash).
Shot To Shot w/Buffer Full - The time between the last shot that fills the buffer to the moment that the shutter sounds again.
Clear Buffer - The time that it takes the camera to clear the buffer after a full burst of pictures has been taken.

We performed each test three times and averaged the results. Below are the resolution, quality setting, and average file size used for the tests.

Resolution (pixels) Quality setting Avg. file size (MB)
Canon SD400 2592x1944 Superfine 3.14
Nikon S1 2592x1944 5M* 1.68
Olympus IR-300 2560x1920 Super High 0.83
Sony DSC-T33 2592x1944 Fine 2.20

Single Shot Shot to Shot Shot to Shot w/Flash Shot to Shot w/Buffer Full Clear Buffer
Canon SD400 N/A 1.46 5.70 N/A N/A*
Nikon S1 N/A 1.93 6.55 2.98 10.91
Olympus IR-300 1.51 2.33 6.48 3.37 4.26
Sony DSC-T33 0.90 1.04 5.43 N/A 8.75 / 4.96

In keeping consistent with every other Sony digicam that we have tested in the past, the Sony T33 proves to have an incredibly fast cycle time of 1.04 sec. without the flash. The Canon SD400 has the second fastest cycle time of 1.46 sec. followed by the Nikon S1 and the Olympus IR-300. With the flash enabled, the cameras slow down fairly evenly with the Sony T33 in the lead followed by the Canon SD400. When set to Continuous drive, the most impressive camera was the Canon SD400, which could take images at 2.11 fps for 18 frames. If a faster flash card is used in the SD400, it could continue shooting at this rate until the flash card is filled up. The runner up was the Nikon S1, which took between 14 and 18 frames at 1.61 fps. Again, with a faster flash card, the number of frames would probably be much higher. The Sony T33 has two continuous drive modes. When we set it to "Burst", it was able to take 9 frames at 1.35 fps. When set to "Speed Burst", the T33 was able to take 4 frames at 3.23. The Olympus IR-300 put in a rather mediocre performance, taking 6 frames at 1.29 fps.

We had some difficulty measuring our "Shot to Shot w/Buffer Full" portion because it was impossible for us to fill the buffer for either the Canon SD400 or Sony T33 by taking images one at a time. However, with the Nikon S1, we had to wait nearly 3 seconds (2.98) before shooting another frame after filling the buffer. For the Olympus IR-300, the wait was 3.37 sec. After filling the buffer with a continuous burst of images, the Nikon S1 took the longest to clear its buffer at 10.91 sec. The next slowest was the Sony DSC-T33 followed by the Olympus IR-300.

* We were unable to measure the Canon SD400's buffer clearing time accurately simply because we could never fill the buffer. However, after shooting anything over 18 frames in continuous drive mode, we found that the SD400 took approximately 2 seconds to finish writing data to the SD card.

Battery Performance Resolving Fine Lines
Comments Locked

35 Comments

View All Comments

  • R3MF - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link

    < owns a panasonic fx8, and loves it.
  • sciwizam - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link

    Nice, I just ordered a SD400 yesterday!
  • bigpow - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link

    Panasonic FX7 >> Canon SD400 & it's cheaper
  • Fricardo - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link

    Heh. Just a day or two after I asked for an SD400 review you guys come up with this. Thanks.
  • astralusion - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link

    excellent review...i'd been waiting for a full sd400 review, also just wanted to say that your selection of Duke for your sample pictures was an excellent choice.
  • UNCjigga - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link

    As a long-time Canon customer, no surprise here. Right now, Canon makes the best consumer-level digicams period. Sony may be close to catching up, and Nikon may have been the shizznit a few years ago, but right now Canon has a considerable lead.

    I really want to get the SD400...but I'm wondering if I should hold out for a newer Canon with wifi.
  • Johnmcl7 - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link

    I've been really impressed with Canon's pocket cameras, I bought their Ixus 500 (the European version of the SD500 I think) as I wanted a camera I could keep in my pocket and have with me all the time, as much as I like my big Fuji it's simply to o big to carry over my shoulder all the time. It's great it takes CF cards, so it can share with the Fuji plus it doesn't leave me regretting too much that I didn't take the Fuji.

    The build quality does feel good but it's really let me down recently, there's a little bit of plastic which broke on the door which holds the memory card door shut, so the camera has had to go back for repair - really missed having it to hand while out at the weekend, looking forward to getting it back.

    John
  • blwest - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link

    #4 both of those cameras suck more than the Olympus and would thus be a waste of time to review. A piece of %$@#$ is a piece of @#$#@.
  • cheesus - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link

    I agree -- great review. However, I was a bit disappointed to see that the Panasonic FX-7 was left out of the review. It's a similarly-priced 5MP ultracompact that has some of the best resolution and color reproduction I've seen. Also comes with optical image stabilization, which i can't say for the other cameras here. I understand that you can't review every ultracompact, but I think the FX-7 beats the SD400 in terms of image quality any day.
  • Larso - Monday, July 18, 2005 - link

    Yes, great review. But it fails to recognize one weakness with the Canon SD400, that sharpness is lacking in the corners of the image (at wideangle).

    I decided to buy the camera anyway because of its excellent performance and nice case, and I'm extremely happy with it!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now